Univariate Stochastic ARIMA Model Forecasting
forecast (with forecast lead l) of a time series Yt at a
forecast origin t is denoted by Ft+l or Ft(l)
which is, in our case, always a combination of previous
forecast can obviously also be written in terms of previous
that from (I.III-17) it follows
that the forecast variance is
due to (V.I.1-238) and (V.I.1-233)
it follows that
the forecast function (c.q. the conditional expectation of Yt+l
at t) is the minimum mean square error forecast. Also it is
quite evident that the forecasts are unbiased
variance of the forecast is equal to the first term of the RHS of
(V.I.4-4). This illustrates why (V.I.1-51)
(and especially the y-weights)
can be used to compute the forecast confidence interval.
is furthermore nice to see that the random innovations (c.q. shocks)
are in fact equivalent to the one
period ahead forecast error since
(V.I.4-5) and (V.I.4-7) it follows that the one step ahead forecast
errors are not correlated. Remark however that forecast errors for l
> 1 are not uncorrelated.
are two formulae for computing the correlations
between forecast errors (l > 1): correlations between
forecast errors at different origins with equal lead times, and
correlations between forecast errors at equal origins with different
between forecast errors at different origins with equal leads
are given by
can be easily proved on using
proves (V.I.4-8) (Q.E.D.).
between forecast errors at equal origins but with different
leads are given by
the covariance is
together with (V.I.4-12), proves (V.I.4-11) (Q.E.D.).
of ARIMA(p,d,q) models
which it follows that
(V.I.4-15) provides a recursive
forecasting algorithm which can be solved using a computer and a
programming language able to perform recursions.
forecast variances (and
hence also the confidence probability limits) can be obtained from
are computed from
can be used to equate coefficients of powers of B such that
that if j > max(p + d - 1, q) eq. (V.I.4-18) reduces to
the variance of the forecast is equal to the first term of the RHS
of (V.I.4-4), it follows that
intervals can thus also be easily obtained.
explicit examples of the so-called eventual
forecast functions are given in BOX and JENKINS (1976) and in
MILLS (1990). These functions are used to study the fundamental
nature of the forecasts. Since this goes beyond the scope of this
work, and since the fundamental techniques of studying these
forecast functions has already been given in previous sections, we
only refer to the relevant literature.